Bill Traynor

Hi @jhauser-us all of the issues you listed above have been addressed.

Hi @jhauser-us just wanted to check in to see if you've had a chance to review.

Thanks again, @jhauser-us all of these issues have been fixed. Note that a few of them exist in the released spec, so the asciidoc version is moving forward with corrections...

I believe one of the - i in the pseudocode and one of the spelling mistakes that I can't remember off the top of my head. I can check again...

Done. Please see [PR](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/pull/1320). Is versioning the chapter as 1.0.0 still valid? And does this PR resolve this issue? I'll leave it to @gfavor or @aswaterman to close.

Hi Tommy, Thanks for pointing this out. I'll verify the Vector version today and update the spec. There was mention in the Vector discussions of moving the ratified version to...

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:15 AM Tommy Murphy ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi Bill > > Thanks a lot for your reply. > > > I'll verify the Vector...

In looking closer at Vector, the introduction of the chapter indicates the following "This document is version 1.1-draft of the RISC-V vector extension. NOTE: This version holds updates gathered after...

Hi Tommy, thanks for your feedback. Let me see if I can add some clarity to the current landscape: 1. The two published (20240411) primary ISA specifications, Volume I: Unprivileged...