tunneldigger
tunneldigger copied to clipboard
wlanslovenija
Sync version number with openwrt/lede package
The openwrt package currently lists a different version than is tagged in the tunneldigger repo. We should work to keep them in sync in the future.
Releasing a new version for the fix with new kernels makes sense, I think. I was going to advocate for that once #66 is merged.
I think that I will tag a new version soon, but still gotta think what the appropriate version would be. I mean, we can move to 1.0 as far as I am concerned
I am not sure about 1.0, maybe that should wait for IPv6 support and some more research into figuring out why we need all that NAT hackery?
gluon, which also includes a tunneldigger package, seems to just use date and git SHA instead of a version number, so there is no version constraint there. Looking at https://github.com/wlanslovenija/firmware-packages-opkg/blob/master/net/tunneldigger/Makefile, maybe the next version should be 0.5.0?
@robimarko what does it take to make a version, beyond pushing a tag?
Well, we can wait for IPv6 but I don't think that anybody is developing Tunneldigger at all.
In Otvorena mreza we also use latest GIT tag.
We can simply push a tag and edit it in source as its referenced couple of times
Just to be clear, I think 0.5 is fine any time, just for 1.0 I feel it should be "more ready". But I don't care strongly, and I certainly agree it's about time to have a tag again.
For me 0.5 is fine also, its been way too long and a lot of changes in meantime have happened. Only issue I am having current commit is that init script on OpenWrt for broker is broken.
@pmelange can you make sure that the version 0.4.0 is getting used properly on the lede side?
@pmelange can you make sure that the version 0.4.0 is getting used properly on the lede side?
Merged https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/21752