Wojciech Kaczmarek
Wojciech Kaczmarek
Thanks for the response! And congratulations on being married - it's a wonderful thing! :DD I guess I will find a time to check what you said later in a...
Jon, That was long, but.. is it possible for you to check if recent @yrashk changes wrt to umbrella projects fix your case as well? Reprise 0.4.0 TIA
Hello. Unfortunately partials occured to be broken due to the fact how builder macro works. It can hardly be fixed without a big internal redesign. Sorry to say that... I...
Interesting. Yeah. I was aiming at more ambitious solution but this may work. Thank you, it is going to get me to bring back my Elixir hacking env, not tomorrow...
I think the `text` macro could be aliased to `eval` to make it more clear that in this context we want to evaluate what comes from another `builder` invocation, what...
Optimistic type safety, generally possible in Erlang/Elixir with dialyzer, is used in WebAssembly, but this all works in a slightly different way than you may expect. Main point of WebAssembly...
Hey! Good job I think CI changes +1 Formatter: yeah WebAssembly was done during wild wild west years, where it was common to use paren-less calls.. I guess me as...
Hey, I use a commit with PR #220 merged extensively in my projects. It would be great to have new tagged version containing it! And this issue closed that way.
@fishcakez yup that seems more consistent than crafting new timestamp in the backend
So looks like the timestamp code in Utils is to be trashed anyway ;)