wishbone1138

Gotcha! I always wondered what those two meant, since claymore seems to report a lot more of that than other miners. I noticed you closed this, so I'm assuming we...

Nanopool does not support invalid share unfortunately.. Unless I'm missing something/ https://eth.nanopool.org/api I'll try to walk through the wiki soon. I need to match it up to what I'm graphing...

Using the latest on a brand new DB just to test out. A few observations. Your 24hr profit based on pool_payments doesnt' seem to work well for cases in which...

Correct, so it adds up the difference of every entry in the last 24 hours (non negative if it reduces to 0 for payout). It can miss a small increment,...

Sorry, nanopool. I'm going to try to fix a couple of things in nanopool today, so I might throw that in as well. (We have another thread open on the...

My fix isn't working properly. It appears that some payments may not change the date and some will (or they happen too fast?). What this means is that some payments...

From what I've seen the only issue I'm having appears to be with SC (ETH AND ZEC both work fine in nanopool). It never gets a separate date for confirmed...

Gotcha, so "POOL_LABEL" in RIG_LIST and "LABEL" in POOL_LIST need to match? We probably need to call that out. I can't remember if I had another use for coin in...

I guess we could use the pool_label/pool_label_dcoin instead? I use the coin_label for tables in grafana but there's no reason I couldn't use the pool labels instead, since I never...

Implemented in miner-ewbf and miner-claymore. Right now I'm only writing out -1 to active_gpus, total_hr, and total_hr_dcoin (if applies). In addition, I'm only writing miner_system_[module] and not miner_gpu_[module]. It wouldn't...