Christoph M. Wintersteiger
Christoph M. Wintersteiger
@mikbras sure, that sounds like a good idea. I was able to work around my immediate problem with mbedTLS, but it would be great if we could get a more...
+1 I'm in favour if we can find something that works reliably and quickly. If we want to check only for _missing_ headers, we could try to simply compile each...
This is in general really hard to test. It may be possible to test some of it by combining recovery with network partitions, e.g. isolate the primary we can wait...
Null byte from PEM removal: https://github.com/microsoft/CCF/pull/3885.
Searching for `->data)` gets me a few more similar pieces of code. `src/http_parser.h` feels like it might be possible to dereference an invalid `parser->data` there. `src/host/signal.h` is very similar to...
Awesome, thanks for the quick analysis!
I think the `Ledger` is also cleaned up sufficiently well at the end of `main`. There are a couple of references to it passed around (e.g. `asynchost::NodeConnections`), but I think...
Just checking I understand correctly. By multiple epochs, do you mean recoveries, i.e. this would be the test for the changes for #3343?
Use `&` instead of `;`? E.g. compare `set PATH=..\kremlib;%PATH% ; echo %PATH%` with `set PATH=..\kremlib;%PATH% & echo %PATH%`
Does it pop up any dialogs in the background saying that it didn't find DLL so and so?