Winter
Winter
Happy to do it in tandem with someone else (👋, @zmitchell), at least for now.
Hi @AMDmi3, > These changes are not good, as these allow arbitrary long maintainer lists for arbitrary count of packages, resulting in N² of not too useful data. I'm currently...
> I'm currently removing team maintainers from maintainers, but that's not possible for stable branches as these do not have teams in meta. Could you revert this change in the...
What Nixpkgs revision are you using?
@max-pfeiffer @jamesla Assuming you both use channels, please run `nix-instantiate --eval '' -A lib.trivial.version`. If not, please give me the Nixpkgs revision you're using.
Nobody has answered this yet 🙂: > Assuming you both use channels, please run `nix-instantiate --eval '' -A lib.trivial.version`. > > If not, please give me the Nixpkgs revision you're...
I suppose it's possible that a Nix regression happened in the meantime... hm.
I spent some time looking into this, and the only real issue I could find was what @sandydoo observed way back when: that the system closure isn't being substituted in...
@alexfmpe What is the exact revision of Nixpkgs that you are running into this with, and what is the error message you received that led you to bootstrap again? Also:...
Not infra, but a few questions that come to mind: 1. Will other nodes “mindlessly” grab the repo(s); as in, would other nodes only be pulling if a user requests...