feat(frontend): run steps from graph
- Add possibility to run the flow steps from the graph
- Add an input popover
Deploying windmill with
Cloudflare Pages
| Latest commit: |
cc3cb90
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://1ed40db7.windmill.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://glm-feat-frontend-test-step.windmill.pages.dev |
/ai review the pr
Claude finished @diegoimbert's task —— View job
PR Review Analysis
Reviewing PR: feat(frontend): run steps from graph
Todo List:
- [x] Read and analyze key changed files
- [x] Review new testing functionality implementation
- [x] Check graph integration and UI patterns
- [x] Examine Svelte 5 usage and reactivity patterns
- [x] Provide comprehensive review feedback
Overall Assessment: ✅ Strong Implementation
This PR successfully adds flow step testing functionality from the graph UI with well-architected components and good integration. The code quality is high with proper Svelte 5 patterns and clean separation of concerns.
Key Strengths
🎯 Excellent Architecture
TestStepsclass: Well-designed reactive state management with proper encapsulation using private$statefields- Component separation: Clean separation between
ModuleTest(logic),InputPickerInner(UI), and integration components - Event flow: Proper event propagation from graph nodes → ModuleTest → TestSteps
⚡ Proper Svelte 5 Usage
- Consistent use of
$state,$derived,$effectrunes - Proper
$bindableprops for two-way binding - Good use of
$state.snapshot()andstructuredClone()for immutable updates - Effective snippet usage for UI composition
🔗 Robust Integration
- Graph nodes properly pass through
onTestUpToandonEditInputcallbacks - Context system used effectively for sharing FlowEditorContext
- Popover positioning logic handles zoom levels and layout changes
Detailed Code Review
ModuleTest.svelte ✅
// Good: Module-level state for tracking test instances
let testModulesState = $state<Record<string, testModuleState>>({})
// Good: Clean exported API
export function runTestWithStepArgs() {
runTest(testSteps.getStepArgs(mod.id))
}
Strengths:
- Instance counting prevents memory leaks
- Proper cleanup in onMount return function
- Good separation of test execution logic by module type
- Proper flow state updates on job completion
testSteps.svelte.ts ✅
// Excellent: Private reactive state with clean public API
#steps = $state<Record<string, any>>({})
#manuallySetArgs = $state<Record<string, Record<string, boolean>>>({})
Strengths:
- Tracks manual vs automatic argument setting
- Proper integration with
evalValueand flow state - Clean methods for step argument management
- Good use of
structuredClone($state.snapshot())for immutable updates
Input Popover Integration ✅
OutputPicker.svelte:
{#if showInput}
<Popover
floatingConfig={{ placement: 'bottom', offset: { crossAxis: 69 * zoom } }}
contentStyle="width: calc({MIN_WIDTH}px); height: calc({MIN_HEIGHT}px);"
>
Strengths:
- Responsive to zoom levels in graph
- Proper popover positioning logic
- Clean integration with existing OutputPicker patterns
InputPickerInner.svelte:
{#snippet metaData(key: string)}
{#if testSteps?.manuallySetArgs[id]?.[key]}
<button onclick={() => testSteps?.updateArg(id, key, $flowStateStore, flowStore?.val, previewArgs?.val)}>
<RefreshCw size={12} />
</button>
{/if}
{/snippet}
Strengths:
- Visual indicators for manual vs automatic args
- Re-evaluation functionality for manually set arguments
- Good use of snippets for composable UI
Minor Improvements Suggested
1. Error Handling Enhancement
frontend/src/lib/components/flows/testSteps.svelte.ts:85
// Consider adding error handling for evalValue
this.#steps[moduleId][argName] = evalValue(
argName, modules[0], this.#steps[moduleId] ?? {}, pickableProperties, false
)
Suggestion: Wrap evalValue calls in try-catch to prevent UI crashes on invalid expressions.
2. Type Safety Improvement
frontend/src/lib/components/ModuleTest.svelte:44
// Consider stronger typing for step args
export function runTestWithStepArgs() {
runTest(testSteps.getStepArgs(mod.id)) // any type
}
Suggestion: Define a more specific type for step arguments based on schema.
3. Performance Consideration
frontend/src/lib/components/flows/propPicker/OutputPicker.svelte:87
function updatePositioning(historyOpen: boolean, zoom: number) {
inputPopover?.updatePositioning({...})
popover?.updatePositioning({...})
}
Suggestion: Consider debouncing position updates to avoid excessive calculations during zoom changes.
Integration Quality
Graph Event Flow ✅
// FlowGraphV2.svelte → ModuleNode.svelte → MapItem.svelte → FlowModuleSchemaItem.svelte
onTestUpTo: (id: string) => {
onTestUpTo?.(id) // Clean callback propagation
}
The event flow is clean and well-traced through the component hierarchy.
Context Usage ✅
const { flowStore, flowStateStore, testSteps, previewArgs } =
getContext<FlowEditorContext>('FlowEditorContext')
Proper context usage avoids prop drilling and maintains clean component interfaces.
Testing & UX Considerations
User Experience ✅
- Visual feedback: Loading states, hover effects, proper button states
- Accessibility: Proper button titles and semantic markup
- Responsive: Zoom-aware positioning and responsive popover sizing
State Management ✅
- Consistency: Test state properly synchronized with flow state
- Cleanup: Proper component cleanup prevents memory leaks
- Reactivity: Changes properly propagate through the component tree
Security & Best Practices
No Security Issues Identified ✅
- No direct HTML injection or XSS vectors
- Proper event handling without unsafe operations
- Context isolation maintained
Follows Windmill Patterns ✅
- Consistent with existing flow editor patterns
- Proper use of existing UI components
- Maintains existing keyboard shortcuts and interactions
Conclusion
This is a well-implemented feature that successfully adds step testing functionality to the flow graph. The code demonstrates:
- Strong architectural decisions with clean separation of concerns
- Proper Svelte 5 usage following best practices
- Robust integration with existing flow editor systems
- Good user experience with responsive UI and proper feedback
The implementation is production-ready with only minor suggestions for improvement. The testing functionality integrates seamlessly with the existing flow editor without disrupting established patterns.
Recommendation: ✅ Approve with confidence