Václav Haisman
Václav Haisman
There is [`LOG4CPLUS_ASSERT(logger, cond)`](https://log4cplus.github.io/log4cplus/docs/log4cplus-2.1.0/doxygen/loggingmacros_8h.html#a1de586715dc7a01bf8c2574d845aa70e). It should print the condition source.
> I use log4cplus 2.0.2 compiled with --disable-implicit-initialization. Do you really mean 2.0.2? This feature was contributed in [`2.0.4`](https://github.com/log4cplus/log4cplus/releases/tag/REL_2_0_4)
> I will check it, but afraid that we should filter artifacts by scope before resolving/collecting it. Why? The filter does it for us during the collection. For my test...
When I was looking into this, I looked around the other sources. I saw `org.apache.maven.project.DefaultProjectDependenciesResolver#resolve`. It looks like the original code was trying to do what the `DefaultProjectDependenciesResolver#resolve` does, but...
This will require Haskell code change. We need to repeat the caption text twice, once for first page and once for each later pages. Here is a diff against test...
Here is an updated tables.md and rendered PDF created by patched Pandoc, for reference. [tables.md.txt](https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/files/1972618/tables.md.txt) [tables.pdf](https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/files/1972620/tables.pdf)
[**@jgm**](https://github.com/jgm) commented on [May 8, 2018, 6:39 PM GMT+2](https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/4558#issuecomment-387465255 "2018-05-08T16:39:58Z - Replied by Github Reply Comments"): > We agree, I think, that this should not depend on whether the table...
FYI, I did sign the CLA.
Ping. Is it really that hard to get this simple fix in?
I re-signed the CLA. It should be OK now.