Will Vedder

Results 58 comments of Will Vedder

@stuarthadfieldglobality >AUTH0_EXCLUDED is fairly nondescript, and as all engineers know, source code and functionality therein and documentation have an uncanny habit of getting misaligned. I'd love to see documentation being...

@MGough Thank you for the helpful feedback. I'm especially interested in https://github.com/MGough/auth0-trunk-based-deployments, it's a hidden gem that reveals quite a bit about the usage of the Deploy CLI. I'll make...

**Update:** As a feature this has been implemented and released in [v7.7.0](https://github.com/auth0/auth0-deploy-cli/releases/tag/v7.7.0). Please see #468 for more information about the implementation itself. Example usage: ```json { "AUTH0_DOMAIN": "test.us.auth0.com", "AUTH0_CLIENT_ID": "FOO",...

>Will I still be able to exclude one specific client? @charliearaya For the time-being, yes. However we are considering removing by-ID exclusions for future major releases. The idea being that...

Really happy with the feedback we received on this one. Can assure everyone that we've ingested and internalized all comments. I'm going to close this one out though because the...

Yep, just confirmed this is an issue. It pertains to the logging function that prints a summary of the changes, it's assuming that the attack protection resource will have all...

Finally released with [7.15.0](https://github.com/auth0/auth0-deploy-cli/releases/tag/v7.15.0). Thanks for sitting tight!

This is an interesting problem to solve. You're correct about tenant-specific data existing in the exported configuration files. Given a multi-tenant dealing with hypothetical tenants A and B, do you...

Consider the following exported configuration: ```yaml clientGrants: - client_id: Deploy CLI Application audience: https://test-app.us.auth0.com/api/v2/ scope: - read:client_grants - create:client_grants - delete:client_grants - update:client_grants ``` The `audience` here is hardcoded with...

@ebusi Ah! Ok I see what you mean now. I agree the filename is problematic and don't see any reason why we couldn't exclude the audience value. For the above...