wileyj

> > there is also a question of if we should be re-running all the same tests (which should have been passing prior to release in order for the changes...

it's a block validation party today - will start once #6754 is complete. regarding keeping this in contrib, as long as we can easily exclude stacks-inspect code from any big...

updated the validation script, and a few things are odd so far (not sure if it's bad or not, but it is behaving differently than stacks-inspect in 3.3.0.0.3 for example)....

attaching output from validating all blocks using `range` across 12 partitions. [logs.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/24217519/logs.zip) as noted on the call, since hte blocks are processed serially - it makes more sense why the...

@brice-stacks for readability - this is a little awkward. would be it possible to put the failure on a separate line? _note that this is a synthetic failure i introduced...

neat! I'll give it a try tonight On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 14:20 Brice ***@***.***> wrote: > ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. > ------------------------------ > > In contrib/stacks-inspect/src/lib.rs...

small snag in what i was planning, needto find an alternative: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/27906 basically, the aarch64 musl build needs a specific linker - in this case `https://musl.cc/aarch64-linux-musl-cross.tgz`. however, musl dot cc...

> small snag in what i was planning, needto find an alternative: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/27906 > > basically, the aarch64 musl build needs a specific linker - in this case `https://musl.cc/aarch64-linux-musl-cross.tgz`. however,...

~13 mins for the release builds (minus macos aarch64): https://github.com/wileyj/stacks-core/actions/runs/18697263795/job/53317819898 will need to polish up the process a bit and add in the next steps: - create/save binary archives as...

update: - binaries are being built natively on vm's (no longer using docker) and stored as a build artifact. - docker components are in progress, but the expected data looks...