Catherine
Catherine
@anuejn Have you had a chance to give this another look?
This looks generally reasonable, let's discuss the UI aspects on the next meeting.
I've cherry-picked the first three commits that are unobjectionable and nicely improve our level of support for revC2.
Cherry-picked the ~ALERT commit. Regarding the cache, do you think we can poll and clear the alert in one operation while recording what happened, and then communicating that to the...
OK, I think this is probably fine. Can you rebase? Then I'll give it another look and probably merge.
No idea. I never considered this case and the existing DSL isn't built to support it.
The question is about the platform DSL. Of course you can always bypass the DSL, but it would be nice if we didn't have to.
I suspect the best way to handle this (hopefully very rare!) corner case is to allow passing a tuple to `invert=` rather than a single bool, but I haven't thought...
Ideally an RFC would be a separate issue, though it's not that important here. (It mostly matters when there's a lot of discussion to follow, since a separate issue allows...
> I've submitted a PR. Sorry but any attempt to fix this issue (or any other issue that touches language features) is premature until we actually agree on the design....