Catherine
Catherine
Huh, that is still a 20 kloc diff. I'm not sure when I'll get around to reviewing it in KiCAD.
> The Pull Request failed because it doesn't recognize 'GateMatePlatform' import because I made a separate Pull Request for that in 'amaranth-lang' This is normal. We don't really have a...
I think three things need to happen first: - a libusb1 release - a python-libusb1 release - a glasgow patch enabling RAW_IO plus testing
The release roadmap is https://github.com/libusb/libusb/issues/1647, it looks like there's movement happening, which is great.
> So can't you make it an `if-else` with adding a constant 16 per loop that continues, and then add move_mask when things don't continue? I can! I'm reporting this...
In particular, it's not clear to me that we can't just change the defaults so that any applet gets a buffer holding 5-10 ms of data. This does go against...
(Also, I think the fixed-throughput applet should perhaps be a part of the benchmark applet instead? It does perform a benchmark, and I don't like adding more top-level names unless...
Thank you for the responsiveness! I really value this kind of contribution. > I think one tradeoff could be latency for applets that don't use auto flush / explicitly flush....
Thanks, perfect! If you slice your changes into individual PRs I will likely be able to review and merge them faster (the new benchmark for example could be merged right...
@Sazzach Have you had the chance to take another look at this PR?