Add top-level site to storage key. (#127)

Open wanderview opened this issue 3 years ago • 2 comments

[ ] At least two implementers are interested (and none opposed):
- …
- …
[ ] Tests are written and can be reviewed and commented upon at:
- …
[ ] Implementation bugs are filed:
- Chrome: …
- Firefox: …
- Safari: …

(See WHATWG Working Mode: Changes for more details.)

Jun 02 '22 20:06 wanderview

Its unclear to me if this PR is something we are comfortable merging into the spec now or not. Do we have adequate consensus on using top-level site for partitioning? My sense is we have at least two engines between chromium and gecko, but there are still some differences to webkit (ephemeral 3rd party storage).

Jun 08 '22 18:06 wanderview

I think that only affects how long the storage is kept, not how it's keyed, right?

It seems to me that all browsers want to align on this keying.

cc @johnwilander @cdumez

Jun 09 '22 08:06 annevk