Antonin Delpeuch
Antonin Delpeuch
No your issue is not linked to qualifiers - but it's also an interesting one, I replied there :)
Use case mentioned [here](https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/issues/4318) by @mshd: > I would like to reconcile Wikidata with a certain qualifier. Is it that possible, if not, could you implement it? > > ###...
Let me expand on the design questions that need to be resolved before this can be implemented. This issue can be understood in multiple ways: 1. I want to fetch...
> As a workaround we could use case 1 and do the filtering in Open Refine later. The problem with 1. is that it would only fetch the qualifier values,...
@antoine2711 for 4., the problem is not to find a syntax for it, but rather to see how it would fit in the protocol. At the moment, when the user...
I guess one hacky workaround would be to let the user fetch the full JSON of the statements, and we would let them manipulate that themselves in OpenRefine. After all,...
All I can say is that I do not know how that should be implemented. Again, proposals and pull requests are welcome.
This could be because the type hierarchy is too big for us to fetch all subclasses of work (Q386724).
Those are only the direct subclasses, not the indirect ones. To get the indirect ones you need to replace `wdt:P279` by `wdt:P279*`.
If there is, I have not found it yet! I think this is one of the weakest points of this service and I personally do not see a way out...