Wessel
Wessel
@nstarman Aha, I like that even better, since now the syntax is symmetric and indeed more Pythonic! Would be very happy to go for that. :)
@PhilipVinc, you make some solid arguments! @nstarman, what do you think? In this case, I think that the functionality could be fairly easily implemented with a third-party function resulting in...
Happy to go with `plum.experimental` if @PhilipVinc is also happy with that!
@PhilipVinc Multiple dispatchers are required to emulate something like how scoping works in Julia. For example, in Julia, if package A defines a function f but does not export it,...
@PhilipVinc This is super interesting! I've taken some time to think about your approach, to try to really understand what is going on. Define varargs as the corresponding infinite set...
> therefore true according to your condition. I think that's the other condition, right? I think you have a set on the right. `{(int)}
@PhilipVinc, after thinking about it a bit more, I think trying to define a partial order directly which does what you implement might not be the right way to think...
@PhilipVinc Please ignore the previous message. I think the failing tests prove that whatever I tried to do there doesn't work. What I'm having trouble fully understanding is that ```python...
> I have to say it's a bit tough for me to follow what you were saying... I mean, I do understand the math/logic but the bigger picture I fail...
@PhilipVinc that sounds good! Let me first focus on this then so we can get it merged asap.