Wesley Wiser
Wesley Wiser
@Amanieu that seems like a reasonable approach to me. My impression from reading other issues that mentioned the "libcpocalyse" was that a 0.3 was fairly unlikely. It sounds to me...
If there's consensus to bump the minimum supported version of musl to 1.2.x, I'm happy to pick this back up and get it ready to merge.
It would also be great to have the ability to do custom sorting of results by an argument. We'll also likely want the ability to drill down into a particular...
Possibly related https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81251
Thanks for the RFC @jsgf! We reviewed it during this week's compiler team steering meeting and had a few thoughts. The RFC suggests creating a distinction between the actual env...
I think @michaelwoerister's plan in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3161#issuecomment-901879322 makes a lot of sense. Reducing the length of symbols by not encoding the field names as @petrochenkov suggests is very valuable especially for...
Hi @SparrowLii, I think this just needs to be rebased before it can be r+'d again.
@nikic Do you think we should wait for a proper untyped representation in LLVM IR as @erikdesjardins mentions or should we consider merging this?
@matklad While I do know a bit about the incremental system, I wouldn't consider myself an expert. I believe @pnkfelix knows a fair bit more than I.
**Hooray!** The @rust-lang/compiler team has decided **to accept** this RFC. To track further discussion, subscribe to the tracking issue here: rust-lang/compiler-team#757