weslambert
Thanks, I will take a look.
Ah, I see -- should close I this out then?
Agreed. Sounds good! 👍
@dadokkio Thoughts on this? https://github.com/fireeye/capa/issues/50 Assuming we should wait until it's fully supported for Python 3?
Awesome, thanks! I've thought about using an executable with another analyzer before, but wasn't sure if that would be acceptable. So, it would just be run from the analyzer directory...
Thanks @williballenthin !
Currently running into an issue w/ permissions and the file creation associated with the following: https://github.com/fireeye/capa/issues/244
Should be fixed very soon upstream, at which point, I'll finish the implementation of this analyzer.
1.3.0 was released today. Continuing to test/develop.
@dadokkio what do you think of something like the following? (Tactic -> Technique -> Capability -> Metadata (rule, examples)) 