Weisheng Wu

Yes, it passed step 10. There are these files: ``` 10.coassembly_with_drepGenomes.contigcov 10.coassembly_with_drepGenomes.mapcount 10.coassembly_with_drepGenomes.mappingstat 11.coassembly_with_drepGenomes.mcount 12.coassembly_with_drepGenomes.cog.funcover 12.coassembly_with_drepGenomes.kegg.funcover 13.coassembly_with_drepGenomes.orftable ```

Sorry for the delay. There was some sample confusion on our side. We just added 500 more samples so there are now ~1000 samples in total. I'll switch to version...

Hi @fpusan Sorry to be back to a naive question. I know that each bin is supposed to be a MAG and I should use bins for genome-level comparison between...

> Hi @fpusan > I'm running SQM on dereplicated bins. After 5 days the progress is at "Step 10.mappsamples". It looks like this step will take more than a month...

The problem was solved. SQM version 1.7 worked smoothly. Thanks!

@atabeerk Thanks for your quick reply! My references are just ~1kb since this is amplicon sequencing, so I think it's promising.

Hi @hermannromanek , any thoughts/suggestions on this?

Hi @fritzsedlazeck I've shared a globus link with Fritz ([email protected]). The folder contains the BAM, index, and the VCF. Let me know if you want me to use a different...

Now I think it may be because there are significantly more reads in the new data. Another question: I read from this [thread](https://github.com/nanoporetech/dorado/issues/617) that different GPU architecture may affect reproducibility....

Hi @HalfPhoton I remove the reads that have min baseq lower than 10, but this won't do anything with the low baseq portions in the remaining reads. Our analysis goal...