`extend-protocol`/`defprotocol`/etc. incorrectly uses indentation specs for method names

[camsaul]

There seems to be a problem with [[:inner 1]] indentation handling when you have a indentation spec defined that matches the form symbol inside something like extend-protocolordefprotocol`. E.g. if you have a config like

{:extra-indents '{my.namespace/with-x [[:block 0]]}}

Then a file like

(ns my.namespace)

(defprotocol MyProtocol
  MyClass
  (with-x [this x]
    "with-x is a method"))

(extend-protocol MyProtocol
  MyClass
  (with-x [this x]
    (+ this x)))

Gets reformatted to

(ns my.namespace)

(defprotocol MyProtocol
  MyClass
  (with-x [this x]
          "with-x is a method"))

(extend-protocol MyProtocol
  MyClass
  (with-x [this x]
          (+ this x)))

It's using the [[:block 0]] spec for my.namespace/with-x rather than respecting the [:inner 1] rules specified for defprotocol and extend-protocol.

Failing test:

(is (reformats-to?
     ["(ns my.namespace)"
      ""
      "(defprotocol MyProtocol"
      "MyClass"
      "(with-x [this x]"
      "\"with-x is a method\"))"
      ""
      "(extend-protocol MyProtocol"
      "MyClass"
      "(with-x [this x]"
      "(+ this x)))"]
     ["(ns my.namespace)"
      ""
      "(defprotocol MyProtocol"
      "  MyClass"
      "  (with-x [this x]"
      "    \"with-x is a method\"))"
      ""
      "(extend-protocol MyProtocol"
      "  MyClass"
      "  (with-x [this x]"
      "    (+ this x)))"]
     {:extra-indents '{my.namespace/with-x [[:block 0]]}}))