David Strayhorn

My view is that in the long term, we are going to have a myriad of algos for a variety of applications. Just bc I propose doing things one way...

On the question of whether 0 means "explicitly anti trust" versus "I don't know": in my view, your question underscores the fact that trust requires two numerical fields, not just...

I definitely envision that one day curators will charge for their work. Perhaps we will all become curators. Imagine that instead of leaving a review for a coffee shop for...

On the topic of mute lists: When I calculate influence scores, I do what I call "interpretation," which means I take some piece of data, like a follow or a...

Regarding the NYT: you are 100% on target. This is exactly how we are going to attract the masses. Because WoT is the only way to prevent the manipulation that...

btw, one of the reasons I keep bringing up the Influence Score in this thread is that it follows a similar format as a NIP-77 trust attestation in the sense...

> This is a PRE so why not simple remove it instead of marking it as revoked? Are you referring to NIP-9 for event deletion? I know PREs used to...

> What I mean is updating the 30077 event with no `c`, `score` or `confidence` tags, effectively replacing whatever was attested earlier. That makes sense. In practice I imagine I...

> Just read the NIP again. A few questions: > > > The special value `*` represents general trust in the person. > > How about, just like `score`, leaving...

> > A Trust event is transitive by default (e.g. Alice trusts Bob, Bob trusts Charlie, therefore Alice trusts Charlie). Non-transitive Trust events MUST contain the `["transitive", "false"]` tag. >...