Waylan Limberg

If that is what you want to do. For the reasons stated in my individual responses, I actually think your changes are not improvements, but I don't have the time...

There are a couple factors here. First, we updated to a more recent version of Bootstrap and Bootstrap changed the style of some items. The different look to the close...

The test file already exists. I even pointed to it, but here it is again `test_syntax/extensions/test_attr_list.py`. You just need to add a test case. And yes, this would be a...

In [this comment](https://github.com/Python-Markdown/markdown/issues/1390#issuecomment-1769110216) I stated: > if someone were to submit a PR which consistently altered the attr_list behavior across all elements to allow curly braces, I would be wiling...

I can't replicate this. In fact, notice below that I have not even called `convert` yet. Simply loading the extension ensures that the `Meta` attribute exists. ```python >>> md =...

Now I have reread your report and you note that things are working. But apparently some tool is inspecting the code and not finding the attribute. That is correct. Many...

> As Python Markdown does not provide type annotations That will no longer be true with the next release. See #1379. BTW, @facelessuser I have a question for you in...

> Well, you are documenting the API, yes, but there are no [type annotations](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html). Yes, we are adding type annotionations, which is my point. It will no longer be true...

> Unless you define a `Meta` property upfront and type it, it will show up as a "mystery" attribute. Ah okay, so this is the complaint then. It recently occurred...

To be clear I'm talking about the `__setattr__(self, key, value)` and `__getattr__(self, key)` methods which will accept any non-existent attribute on a class instance and set/get it. Would annotating those...