Waylan Limberg

@JustAPerson that is not related. In fact, that is correct behavior. [Babelmark][1] shows two common results, one which is defined in the Commonmark spec and one which follows the original...

This is clearly a bug as demonstrated by [Babelmark][1], but the "fix" isn't immediately obvious. Consider the expected behavior of the following examples: ``` - item one second paragraph of...

I suspect this is related to #1074, possibly even a duplicate.

Interesting idea. The existing implementation elsewhere certainly helps. However, I have to wonder what use case this meets. Seems weird to me to just skip one in a list of...

I expect this is because the link processor allows for nested brackets. On the bright side, it doesn't crash (many such things raised recursion errors back in version

This projects [goals][1] are documented as follows (emphasis added): > * Maintain a Python 2 and Python 3 library (with an optional CLI wrapper) **suited to use in web server...

> By limiting the recursion depth, let's say by 10 I suppose its noteworthy that in previous versions, we supported 6 levels of brackets. And that was because we used...

> The question is whether there’s interest in trying to solve it. That's what I keep saying. This is not a priority for us. Personally, if you feed the parser...

I'm willing to entertain any PR as long as it maintains backward compatibility. I'll make an exception to the backward comparability rule if someone wants to submit a PR limiting...

@andersk the slowdown is most likely related to the issue in my last comment, not the patterns themselves. I know I've explained this before, but I can't find it so...