Waylan Limberg

> I understand that arbitrary HTML in the headings is undesirable, but for some formatting tags it seems like the most straightforward approach. The problem is that we would need...

So the [code][1] which sanitizes the text for use in the TOC is pretty simple. It simply pulls the text from the HTML elements. It could be significantly more complex...

> I was wondering whether you're aware of any successful attempts to package markdown. Not recently ([Calibre][1] did for many years although I don't believe they do anymore). And the...

I did a little more digging. I was able to artificially generate the same error: ```python >>> spec = importlib.util.find_spec('unknown') >>> print(spec) None >>> unknown = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec) Traceback (most recent...

Are you using any third party extensions? What options are you passing t0 Markdown?

My guess is that the issue is with the extension. As explained in the [release notes][1], we removed some code which was deprecated back in version 3.0. The error message...

My initial proposal suggests that these blocks are different from fenced code blocks, but another option would be to use the fenced code block delimitators and also provide for a...

@facelessuser you make some valid points. I have not looked too closely at how you implemented superfences, and was curious how you worked around the problems with the existing block...

Just stumbled upon [MyST][1], a Commonmark parser which is intended as a reStructuredText replacement. I've seen many before, but this is the first one where I like the [directives syntax][2]....

Very cool. Although, when I initially proposed a template block, I meant to actually use a template. Something like the following, which would allow the end user to define any...