Waldir Pimenta
Rather than proposing specific changes, I was actually looking for some feedback regarding what would be the best way to allow non-members to contribute to the directory, since the current...
Well, since there seems to be a bottleneck in adding new companies (by the companies themselves!) and making the list more complete, I decided to start a community-curated list, inspired...
@galuszkak I didn't miss #145 -- that's why I mentioned "currently _or previously_ involved with the OCI". I assume the root interests are still present, just the association with this...
@galuszkak there are now explicit [inclusion guidelines](https://github.com/waldyrious/awesome-open-company/wiki/Inclusion%20guidelines) to ensure a minimum compliance with the open company ethos. What do you think?
I would surely love to have this in the opencompany.org umbrella rather than as a separate list, but I strongly believe the community-curated aspect (i.e. a wiki-like, no-setup contribution workflow...
Yeah, I second this. It would be nice if the modes that ignore man-made structures (e.g. `planet-waterway-nonartificial`) would still consider these if they are linking two ends of natural waterways....
@quincylvania if I understand you correctly, from the examples I gave above, only the third one would qualify as a diversion, right? The second one (agreeing with @amandasaurus), does seem...
>> Would `waterway=canal`+`usage=tailrace` be considered by waterway as an exception for the purposes of connecting the network of non-artificial waterways > > Yes, if you do that, WWM will treat...
Um, not to be too annoying, but what about [this situation](https://waterwaymap.org/#len=1..inf&map=17.18/41.522821/-7.858844&tiles=planet-waterway-nonartificial)? Screenshot  None of the [current rules](https://github.com/amandasaurus/waterwaymap.org/blob/a407cca9e5f0e95517e7932199f255a59a0991dc/flowing_water.tagfilterfunc) seems to describe a tagging scheme that would apply here. Should that...
Thanks for taking the lead in the discussion and documenting that usage, @jarek! That sounds exactly like what applies in the case I mentioned above. I'll start using `channelised=yes` from...