Waldir Pimenta

Yeah, I wasn't terribly excited about it either, but I do think it's better than brick (I mean, does that even have a meaning? Perhaps it's too non-obvious to me)...

> Hi, @waldyrious thanks for the review. I've change my wording and formatting based on on your review. Have a look. Looks good! Nice work :) > I think, in...

> Btw, since I don't really know about these checks, why did it failed? I don't see any failed checks, actually :thinking: The only "check" I see that is still...

>> I don't see any failed checks, actually :thinking: > > From this [commit](https://github.com/all-contributors/all-contributors/pull/554/commits/6f81d7caeb2551010756d22ececaab122c7ecc5a). Hmm, interesting. According to the [logs of that run](https://app.netlify.com/sites/allcontributors-org/deploys/6151345d3a8d3d0007dc275f#L562), it appears to have gotten stuck in...

IMO using a random order for contributors is overkill; sorting them by name/username would already accomplish an order that is unrelated to the amount / perceived value of contributions, with...

@azemoh would such a contrast version live in this repository? Could you provide some pointers to beginner-friendly documentation, and examples of multi-theme repositories that you consider well organized, for people...

@alexw10, FWIW, when I had a similar setup with Bitbucket, we had a `git publish ` alias that often (but not always) failed to mark pull requests as merged: `git...

@rcaloras this is just off the top of my head, so it may be a naive (or already explored and discarded) idea: couldn't search work if the client encrypts not...

Maybe a minimap showing the current area covered ("zoomed-in" in the actual picker) overlaid on the maximum chroma (over all L) would work?

Awesome work, @ndom91! :clap::clap: For the record, this was first raised in #2, and initial POSIX-ifying work was done in #3.