Waldir Pimenta
Duplicate of #56 :) Network issues perhaps?
Yeah, it appears to be `smartless`-specific:
Forgot to test `smartless -+XF`:
For what it's worth, I interpret goal 11 as suggesting that there shouldn't be two ways to specify a class for a div, especially when the more explicit one is...
Another advantage of `[foo]()` is consistency with the way label-less reference links already work in Djot — i.e., `[foo][]` is equivalent to `[foo][foo]`.
Note: even though there's now a [cheatsheet](https://github.com/jgm/djot/blob/main/doc/cheatsheet.md) (thanks for adding it in #39, @uvtc!), I still think it would be worth showing the rendered HTML output in the full syntax...
> > @uvtc I can't answer for @jgm but _my_ thought is not to replace anything, but rather that `` and `` are specifically for material which was inserted/marked for...
Indeed, I was careless with my comment there and the reference to the thread here — my apologies. I have now added a (hopefully) more considered comment to that thread....
Following the argument of consistency between single and triple backticks, it's worth noting that the syntax for generic blocks could also be made more consistent with that of generic inline...