Waldir Pimenta

Pinging @emilbayes and @mafintosh — this is a one-line change, so it should be an easy decision one way or the other :)

I think this may be the same problem as the one reported in #28. If so, I believe it might make sense to close this issue as a duplicate and...

@nowthis the layout problem with this particular data seems to be resolved (the website produces the same output as the second image in your comment), so I assume the code...

Tested it with the following data, that visualizes a [ranked voting](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting) process: ``` ' == ROUND 1 == ' Candidates that move to the next round with all their votes:...

Copying the image here just in case the original dies (and also for convenience): 

By the way, it's also unclear how "Administrators" differs from "Managers". Perhaps "Administrative assistants" would be clearer? Or simply "Assistants"?

I agree with your points. "Administratives" would work well IMO, in place of "Administrators". That would make the "Manager" category non-confusing as far as I'm concerned, so it could be...

Link to the specific HN sub-thread mentioning tramcar, for convenience: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13920584

It would be good to have some sort of an overview of the current architecture, though, to facilitate improvement. I'm also not sure to which extent the copy of Jobberbase...

I'm not sure how tightly coupled the fossjobs-specific code is to the underlying jobberbase structure. If it could be split, I think forking jobberbase to https://github.com/fossjobs/jobberbase and adding the commits...