Ravi Shankar

I think we can still have per-handler overrides for error codes, just like how we have it for 2xx or other codes. It will then override the default implementation implemented...

We don't support this as of now, but we will (both globally and to individual handlers).

Thanks! I'm always open to new ideas! :smile:

Let's keep it open so that we can track that there's an issue with this usage.

For actix-web plugin, we have an approach in #219

We can certainly expose this. We already have something similar called `ResponderWrapper` (which we use for `impl Responder` stuff). Although, if they're types from other commonly used crates, then we...

`actix_multipart::Multipart` now has the schema enabled through a feature gate (#182)

You're right that paperclip doesn't support security/securityDefinitions yet (it'll be part of the next release). Per-operation headers are not available as of now (I'll certainly take a look), but there's...

As of now, paperclip uses unit structs to implement a trait (`Apiv2Operation`) which contains the auto-generated schema information. You're right that it's designed for function-like handlers, but we can make...

> Is there a better/easier way to achieve this goal? I'm... not sure. Right now, the only way I see forward is to add a feature gate for both `uuid`...