waalge

🙈 That escalate quickly! My question is malformed, and premised on a misunderstanding of what _ought_ to happen on handling an `ETag` **with `If-None-Match`. In our case, the utxos act...

Maybe `If-Range` header? This would handle the optimistic case well. The pessimistic case is still awkward since kupo would still reply `200`, with everything following spec. Rather than the preferred...