W3C Bot

Results 227 comments of W3C Bot

This was discussed during the [#did meeting on 19 June 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/06/19-did-minutes.html#950a). View the transcript TTL construct required? <ottomorac> w3c/did#896 ottomorac: Okay moving on ottomorac: This an issue migrated from DID...

This was discussed during the [#did meeting on 26 June 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/06/26-did-minutes.html#ac43). View the transcript need TTL construct? #896 <ottomorac> w3c/did#896 ottomorac: previous meeting discussed adding a validity period manu: best...

This was discussed during the [#did meeting on 19 June 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/06/19-did-minutes.html#cbe3). View the transcript Language clarification "A DID document is a representation of information describing a DID subject." w3c/did#912 <ottomorac>...

This was discussed during the [#did meeting on 11 November 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/11/11-did-minutes.html#6de9). View the transcript w3c/did-resolution#244 <Wip> https://w3c.github.io/did-resolution/#dereferencing-algorithm JoeAndrieu: I think what he's talking about is that there is an option...

This was discussed during the [#did meeting on 11 November 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/11/11-did-minutes.html#a704). View the transcript w3c/did-resolution#244 Wip: We discussed this earlier today Markus -- dereferncing algorithm step 10 is problematic --...

This was discussed during the [#did meeting on 30 October 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/10/30-did-minutes.html#9bde). View the transcript Announcement: DID Path special topic call (5-Nov) <ottomorac> w3c/did-resolution#221 Wip: Don't discuss on the call today...

This was discussed during the [#did meeting on 06 November 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/11/06-did-minutes.html#c9a4). View the transcript DID URL Dereferencing PR <ottomorac> w3c/did-resolution#221 ottomorac: There has been a lot of back and forth...

This was discussed during the [#did meeting on 19 December 2024](https://www.w3.org/2024/12/19-did-minutes.html#acd5). View the transcript w3c/did-extensions#569 manu: If people are not in the same jurisdiction, then we would just keep the...

This was discussed during the [#did meeting on 04 September 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/09/04-did-minutes.html#e31a). View the transcript Create syntactic sugar for relativeRef feature w3c/did-resolution#181 <ottomorac> w3c/did-resolution#181 <ottomorac> Suggestion from Manu on how we...

This was discussed during the [#did meeting on 11 November 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/11/11-did-minutes.html#f4e8). View the transcript w3c/did-resolution#233 Wip: moving on - we have a yellow flag - we use term "match" and...