w3c
Add warning about self attested DID document metadata
This was discussed during the #did meeting on 02 October 2025.
View the transcript
w3c/did-resolution#206
Wip: Yes so general call to the group we need to have at least 2 reviews...
<Wip> https://
Wip: This is simple PR just to address the issue.... any reactions?
Manu: This is RFC language, so need to clarify the SHOULD....
Manu: Perhaps just need to address the suggestion sentence, we need to be careful about how implementers would interpret, it might even be good for the "security considerations"
This was discussed during the #did meeting on 06 November 2025.
View the transcript
w3c/did-resolution#206
wip: Obviously, Markus isn't here, and he's technically the editor, but we've stagnated a little bit in the last month or so. It would be nice to have others get involved in the PRs and get them merged.
… PR 206 hasn't had any review, and it has just sat there, so if people could take a look at it we could get it in.
This was discussed during the #did meeting on 04 December 2025.
View the transcript
w3c/did-resolution#206
ottomorac: this one is about self-attested DID document metadata
… also approved by swcurran, some changes by manu
… it would be good to have Markus for this one
JoeAndrieu: some text close to the PR, but not changed by the PR, is incorrect
… I can raise this as an issue
swcurran: [proposes alternative text, that JoeAndrieu is happy about]
Three approvals, this looks good to merge.
@peacekeeper / @msporny should I squash or rebase and merge