Section 7.1 refers to nonexistent `item` property (should be `items` or not wrapped in code tag)

[trwnh]

This Activity is added by the receiver as an item in the inbox OrderedCollection

there is no such item property, it should be items or otherwise should not be wrapped in code tags which suggests it is a property name.

proposed solution

errata to either:

• s/item/items
• remove the <code> tags wrapping "item"

[TallTed]

Well, it shouldn't become "as an items in".

So perhaps "This Activity is added by the receiver to the items in the inbox OrderedCollection".

[trwnh]

on further reflection it should be removing the code tag because the property may be orderedItems in most cases

[evanp]

I agree, it makes sense to rephrase this so that the item string does not suggest a property name. Let's add an erratum to that effect. Maybe something like:

This Activity is added by the receiver to the inbox OrderedCollection

[evanp]

Removing WFC; will come back and work on an erratum.

[evanp]

I added an erratum as follows:

Section 7.1 "Delivery" should read in part This Activity is added by the receiver to the inbox OrderedCollection.