EasierRDF
EasierRDF copied to clipboard
w3c
Making RDF easy enough for most developers
To get things even more mainstream we need to have graduates with the skills. Semantic Web unit: - will need to be approved by the organisation at quite a high...
There are various pages around W3C etc. but as we know, these get moribund. And they aren't in RDF, never mind Linked Data. Are we not now at the stage...
IRIs must be allocated for almost everything in RDF: things, concepts, properties, etc. -- both TBox (ontology/schema) and ABox (instance data). IRI allocation is easy in theory but hard in...
The Web of Thinks seeks to overcome the fragmentation of the IoT through an abstraction layer that sits well above the details of the myriad IoT technologies and standards. The...
"having a vocabulary and semantics for forwards compatible introduction of new semantic extensions could be nice too (imagine in worst case of compatibility a tool alert "The loaded document uses...
"allow different profiles that plug in different semantics. Open world assumption doesn't fit your use case? Use a profile that has NAF or WFS, or answer-sets, or production rules, or...
They currently have a special status in RDF. "RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax currently contains many caveats to accommodate the idiosyncratic nature of language-tagged strings" https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2018Nov/0090.html "It is a...
RDF should allow "anyone to say anything about anything", but RDF does not currently allow literals as subjects! (One work-around is to use -- you guessed it -- a blank...
Since RDF natively supports only binary relations, relations between more than two entities must be encoded using groups of triples. A W3C Working Group Note[9] describes some common patterns, but...
In natural language, we have some words with a widely agreed meaning - these are words you can look up in a dictionary. We also have names that can only...