vyzo

@Stebalien thoughts and pointers?

@MarcoPolo can we get someone from the shipyard to look at this?

thank you!

check the failure history in #553 -- maybe a bug was introduced there? Feel free to review.

ok, then it's not a suspect! Thanks for digging in.

I completely agree. I think we should have ttls in utc seconds, and the signature should probably include them when present. I think we need a pubsub spec change for...

actually expiration in the envelope.

hrm, including in the signature maybe backwards incompatible, so it can only be advisory as it may be tampered with.

I think this would break some systems that rely on it.

> Make it a per-topic option. Sure.