vyzo

I am ready to merge this.

I think this is very important for multiple reasons: - avoid conflict in method names - allow objects to implement multiple interfaces with conflicting method signatures, and safely do so...

cc @fare

Implementation in #1287 Remaining TODO: validate method signature and inject type assertions in the implementation.

Thanks for reporting! Yes indeed, the repl has broken with the recent changes.

In general I agree with the idea of getting early/immediate integration, but one pain point is that our users (e.g. pubsub users) are not necessarily ready to adopt the new...

yes, i agree and i am quite concerned about this.

but lets not forget that they also have a tendency to break things... sigh.

yeah... all we need now is a volunteer. It is a non invasive procedure, with less than 99% chance of implosion creating a microscopic blackhole that devours the earth.

yeah, lets do it -- just no automerge of the pr, even if it passes the tests. Some maintainer has to merge it.