vyzo

I think I prefer the `ipfs name follow` approach, as it's clear that it something that works with namesys (ie it's ipns functionality).

that's an interesting idea.

sure, care for a patch?

yeah, let's finalize things first though.

I think that's a reasonable thing to do.

In principle it is more correct to use a stream oriented approach as it avoids a lot of pitfalls with disconnects, but it is a rather complex change.

There is a publish option to wait until there are enough peers.

The library can't guess the user's requirements.

I have a real-world concern with this mechanism. It is implied that the dialing of the relay address won't start until the previous dials have failed. However, in the case...

Ok, good -- I had a nightmare last night that we deployed relays and they didn't work because we wouldn't dial them :) I think we should lower the delay...