"the component" is not clear in emits docs

[ITwrx]

It would be nice if declaring-emitted-events said to define the emits on "the child component" or "the component which emits the event" instead of just "the component", as "the component" could be misinterpreted as "the parent component" or "the listening component".

Thanks

[NataliaTepluhina]

@ITwrx unfortunately, saying emitted events can be explicitly declared on the component is equally confusing, and mitted events can be explicitly declared on the component which emits the event sounds very repetitive so I wouldn't go with this phrasing. Maybe you have some other ideas on how to make the description more readable?

[ITwrx]

in this case, i might would say events can be explicitly declared on the emitting component. I believe emitted in the beginning of emitted events can be explicitly declared on the component to be superfluous, and past tense is less than ideal when describing the declaration of events which have yet to be emitted.