Vsevolod Stakhov
Vsevolod Stakhov
Ok, it seems to be more or less functional now I hope.
@wez it seems there might be an issue with headers rewriting in the Rust. Or maybe I don't understand the original logic... ```diff --- a/crates/kumod/src/smtp_server.rs +++ b/crates/kumod/src/smtp_server.rs @@ -2619,9 +2619,12...
It seems to be somehow related to OpenSSL 3.0 I suppose. It works with OpenSSL 3.3.
> Question would still stands, if that failure handling is correct thing to do instead of producing soft failures? Crypto based verification would be a part of all checks? Well,...
Indeed: https://docs.redhat.com/fr/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/html/security_hardening/proc_re-enabling-sha-1_using-the-system-wide-cryptographic-policies They are just retarded, pardon my French.
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18867 for reference
Why it worked previously: we have used a legacy raw API that is like "deprecated" in OpenSSL 3.0+. Why doesn't it work now: because RedHat are "securrrity" adepts and have...
I was thinking about it, but I'm not convinced that it's a correct approach, as this is all related to a specific policies of a specific linux distro (for example,...
https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/pull/5189