Vsevolod Stakhov

I think you are reporting the already fixed issue: https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/pull/4449

ARC standard is really very bogus... Why should we continue a broken chain (or why the fuck do we have that `cv` field after all), and why should we start...

That's exactly the same issue I'm afraid... I'm testing Rspamd with the bundled `fmt` so it's quite hard for me to check the corner cases.

This library looks very useful indeed. I can imagine a bunch of rules that could utilise it. I did some benchmarks and they are also not bad: ``` Size: 6,...

No, I don't like the idea to use comments for that purposes. We can probably introduce syntax like `[:

I just do not understand the issue tbh. Is it related to the `whitelisted_ip` option? From the original issue description I can conclude that the `pending` (or `p`) key is...

Ok, I think the reason is that `p` is not cleared. The intention of the `pending` field was to count messages that are currently being processed. However, if you have...

Or no, this symbol has all guards against it: `flags = 'explicit_disable,ignore_passthrough'`

You cannot define per rule whitelist maps, they are defined globally for this module. The main question is why `p` bucket is not clearing. It is increased here: https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/blob/master/lualib/redis_scripts/ratelimit_check.lua#L69 when...

So normally `p` must always be around 0.