Vincent Sevel
Vincent Sevel
thanks @fniephaus
hello. any progress on this? thanks.
/remove-lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
any news on this? cc @matthyx
this is an issue for us as well. we have SB applications trying to fetch the schema registered through the synch operator, and failing with `{"message":"No artifact with ID 'X'...
> and giving up on spec compliance altogether (unless the spec in question actually makes sense). at least temporarily, and hopefully get a way to change the spec.
> I believe such a resolver code already exists since we already support such indirect property references in application.properties hi @sberyozkin agreed. and that has been supported for many years...
hello, do you think this is likely to be implemented at some point?
thanks for this honest answer @radcortez ;) I have thought about it. I should have more time early next year.