Vedran Pavic

See [this comment](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-session/commit/751375338c73136b9b758e069539790620e51c5e#r28862706): > You cannot do that - as you are aware `SessionRepository` implementations handle various internal details when performing save operation, like tracking delta of changes and handling...

The point is that `SessionRepository#save` contract doesn't offer guarantees to do that safely. If it had returned a session instead of `void` that would've been a different story.

@stojsavljevic Can you provide more details about the use case that was the motivation for this? Thanks.

The motivation behind this PR is that, from my experience, in order to have application-wide observability based on Micrometer the use of `@Observed` is basically a given for all but...

@jonatan-ivanov It's unclear to me who is your question aimed at - is it (someone from) the Spring Boot team, or are you asking me to update the PR and...

If the team decides so, and that helps move things forward, no worries about updating the PR.

Sure, I'll update over the next few days.

I looked into updating this PR today, but auto-configuring additional aspects isn't as straightforward as `ObservedAspect`. I'm also not sure whether those should really be a part of the same...

As mentioned in https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/pull/35191#issuecomment-1527906036, I don't have experience with `@Timed` and `@Counted` so I really don't have an opinion on how to structure auto-configuration for the related aspects. Judging by...

Seeing this has been labeled as `for: team-meeting` for nearly 4 months now, can the team maybe share when the community could perhaps expect to see some updates? Thanks.