puppet-splunk
puppet-splunk copied to clipboard
voxpupuli
Allow Splunk/Splunkforwarder to be installed with "package" resource
This is an enhancement request. For those using Satellite or a package manager with the splunkforwarder in their repos it would be great to be able to install the splunkforwarder with the package resource instead of bundling it with the module/in Puppet repo. Any reason this is not supported?
hi @inspired, I'm not 100% sure what you mean. The package is currenty installed via package resource. Do you want to manage it outside of this module?
@bastelfreak Yeah, I'd like to install it with a RPM or APT repo instead of bundling it with the module. As far as I can see that's not supported? Correct me if I'm wrong :-)
I'd like this feature too (was about to implement it myself, but haven't gotten around to it). Where possible, I try to add the Splunk packages to an internal repo, so yum and apt are able to just "simply" install them without puppet providing the binary package as a file.
If we could even just add a flag for this class to simply not manage the package that would even solve the problem for me.
I would even be ok with the puppet module package installing the splunkforwarder package, I have requirements that all my packages be managed centrally in a repository owned by a compliance team. So our firewalls would block access to download the rpms in other ways, but there's an existing repo with splunkforwarder available.
I'm going to add my +1 to this request. Storing binaries and artifacts alongside source code in git is a really bad idea. It's highly inefficient for git and wastes storage storage unnecessarily. I am confused why we're not suggesting the use of the alternative source mechanism by default? https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-splunk/blob/master/manifests/forwarder.pp#L49-L54
My understanding from reading the code is if you set $manage_package_source to false, and then provide a url to $package_source, then this should be doable.
