Michael Vorburger

Indeed, I can see you've used `compilerArgs`. In that case, I guess this is moot, as it's done; I'll close it. PS: You're very welcome to close outdated issues yourself...

@nathanila OMG, wow - thanks a lot! This is the biggest lot so far, so I'm (mostly) "just curious" - where are these from? Auto. gen. by some tooling, or...

@nathanila Thanks for the clarification. I gather that these are created by you alone (not based on other annotation metadata which could have had had an incomptible license, not taken...

Closing this as we're now getting this in via https://github.com/lastnpe/eclipse-null-eea-augments/pull/56 - thanks to @Bananeweizen !

Actually hang on - the #56 only takes the EEA for JDK from this ZIP, right? There's more in it - any takers? slf4j, Jackson, Apache HTTP Client, Glassfish HTTP,...

I totally agree re. remaining on GitHub. The thinking was that perhaps it could move to GitHub.com/eclipse/... instead of here in our org. > Advantage would include Eclipse.org CLA verification....

> My idea was to write an interface/class like: Hm... I was imagining something like that as well, and on further reflection wonder why it couldn't simply be: ```java package...

@maggu2810 @ctron re. "There are also tools to create a stub file from a class" and all, see also new https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=525352. The link above has a full JDK with annotation...

==> https://github.com/lastnpe/external-annotations-esperanto :alien:

Guys, in https://github.com/lastnpe/eclipse-null-eea-augments/pull/72 @rPraml contributes something which addresses one aspect we have previously discussed here - his work seems to cover the _'some sort of unit tests / imagining that...