Volkert de Buisonjé

@stsp By the way (and this is a bit of topic, I admit), would it be feasible to have fdpp run in a dom0 domain on a type 1 (bare-metal)...

A DPMI extension to trap I/O ports? Seems way above my abilities. Also, would this work for most of the protected mode games, that run on the DOS/4GW DOS extender?...

In HVM mode, Xen uses QEMU to emulate necessary hardware. Additionally, if fdpp were to be running in the dom0 domain, it would also get privileged direct hardware access to...

@Baron-von-Riedesel Instead of having to port VSB to a JLM, Would it be practical to add QEMM (QPI) compatibility to Jemm386? I opened a feature request for that: https://github.com/Baron-von-Riedesel/Jemm/issues/6

@juegosenlazaruscr Sorry for the late response, but I would recommend against using this project as a reference when you are writing new code. I would recommend you use a clean...

@Baron-von-Riedesel How feasible do you think it would be to implement this in Jemm? In case the DOSBox commit that @Wengier linked to doesn't provide you with enough context, here...

@HyabusaBadge It begs the question though, would it really be worth the effort implementing GEMMIS in the older EMM386 implementation? Wouldn't the effort be much better spent on porting JEMM...

> I admit that I'm not very interested in this GEMMIS. I fail to see why it should be useful. Well, first of all, I absolutely respect that JEMM is...

Would it really be that disruptive to add, though? Even if you don't care about the feature much, it's basically a control handover protocol, so it wouldn't require any drastic...

@t9999clint GEMMIS is specifially for being able to start Windows 3.x (in its optimal 386 Enhanced Mode) and Windows 9x from (Free)DOS with JEMM loaded and returning back to DOS...