Victor Oliva
Victor Oliva
If you don't need to "summarise" and you only need to keep the last 2000 logs, you can just use `new ReplaySubject(2000)` instead of `new BehaviourSubject()`. The consumer then can...
My suspicion is that this happens after a an inner observable throws an error syncrhonously, or the project function also throws an error. All of this code happens synchronously: ```ts...
@ronag this is also expected. If you think about it, there's no way RxJS can call the disposer function at that point, because you haven't even returned it yet, it's...
Can you please provide a playground with something that can be reproduced? Codesandbox or Stackblitz. I tried a simple example ```ts const links: Observable = null as any; const userInfo:...
@LcsGa currently the [TC39 pipeline operator](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator) is not the one as in the example. The operators in RxJS would be usable in the F# pipe operator proposal, where every operator...
Hey @benlesh I've just updated the PR with the decision taken at #7111. Can you take another look please?
Thank you for looking into this @benlesh. I'll edit my PR with this sometime this week if it hasn't been done already
I see this was introduced in #6527
The API change on tap was quite substantial when used with Subjects, and I think it was a valid use case. `tap` accepted `Observer`, and a Subject is an Observer...
As far as I know this issue has been fixed in the most recent versions of react-rxjs. The exports definition on package.json was addressed in https://github.com/re-rxjs/react-rxjs/pull/302