VoidQuark

@michaelkebe could you please create PR?

> There is PR #203 open Correct, there is a PR, but it is not ready because it hasn’t adjusted everything required.

Significant changes have been made to the Alloy role. You can read more about the changes here: https://github.com/grafana/grafana-ansible-collection/issues/280. This has already been implemented in the new Alloy role, which works...

Significant changes have been made to the Alloy role. You can read more about the changes here: https://github.com/grafana/grafana-ansible-collection/issues/280. This has already been implemented in the new Alloy role. Example: ```yaml...

> > I think it would be good to rename the variable `grafana_alerting` to `grafana_unified_alerting`. > > I agree--for consistency. However, if I'm not mistaken, this is lower level. This...

Based on the message in the Grafana Agent documentation: > Grafana Alloy is the new name for our distribution of the OTel collector. Grafana Agent has been deprecated and is...

Based on the message in the Grafana Agent documentation: > Grafana Alloy is the new name for our distribution of the OTel collector. Grafana Agent has been deprecated and is...

Significant changes have been made to the Alloy role, rendering this PR no longer valid. You can read more about the changes here: https://github.com/grafana/grafana-ansible-collection/issues/280. This has already been implemented in...

Agreed, it should run in check mode. Could you please raise a PR?

@winsmith any progress on this ?