Václav Muzikář

@shawkins Thank you for creating the proposal. Using IPC for commands that require a running server seems like an interesting idea. It would provide a better UX to users removing...

> And just to double check - are sockets, even with restrictions to the remote host being localhost, not allowed here? That's a good question. In theory it increases the...

> Right, I was assuming it would be a non-starter, but wanted to double check just in case. I think the biggest challenge with the sockets approach would be Win...

As I'm thinking about it more, I'm more and more inclined towards keeping the current paradigm that import/export/future command (admin-bootstrap?) starts the server and just improve the UX around it....

I would keep the RealmImport CR impl as is – import the Realm without shutting down the cluster. It only adds Realms, doesn't overwrite it so there should be almost...

@shawkins Do you want to keep it in the 26 milestone?

> Putting this into Config seems a bit artificial as this is not really an SPI and there's only 1 implementation that probably won't be overridden. It might feel artificial...

@shawkins I think the proper new way of deprecating things is to wrap it in a new Profile Feature that will be enabled by default but deprecated right away. Disabling...

I'd say neither. What I would suggest is to have only a single Feature for this that will be marked as deprecated from the beginning. This will allow users who...

> expand the existing logic to enable the deprecated feature if it's the only version? Yeah, seems like that's what needs to be done. For the new release scheme where...