parsifal
parsifal copied to clipboard
vitorfs
Multiple reviewers setting study status independently
Hi,
It would be very cool if the tool allowed reviewers to set the status of each study independently, meaning that Reviewer A could for example accept a certain study, whereas Reviewers B could reject. In such a case, it would be clear in the tool that there was no consensus, and reviewers could act accordingly.
In other words: the status would be an attribute of the revision performed by a reviewer, instead of an attribute of the study.
What do you think?
Hi @rmfalcao Thanks for submitting this issue! We are currently looking into it I think this is going to be a nice addition to the platform
It would be very cool if the tool allowed reviewers to set the status of each study independently, meaning that Reviewer A could for example accept a certain study, whereas Reviewers B could reject. In such a case, it would be clear in the tool that there was no consensus, and reviewers could act accordingly.
In other words: the status would be an attribute of the revision performed by a reviewer, instead of an attribute of the study.
The current limitation is mentioned on this 2020 video https://www.youtube.com/live/u3TYaJpJwEA?feature=share&t=2490 produced by the "Universidade Federal Fluminense".
What do you think?
I think it would be a great, and necessary improvement! Although I'm doing my Systematic Literature Review alone and not needing this feature right now.