Sandro Dias Pinto Vitenti

The redesign is in progress, but the issues here are not the main focus in a first phase. Nevertheless, issue #84 was recently addressed by PR #321. Please, feel free...

Firecrown now uses CCLFactory to instantiate CCL. It has already support for extra parameters (currently CMB extra parameters). Thus, all extra CCL parameter should be configure through this factory. Please,...

@marcpaterno can we close this one?

@JaimeRZP I believe the implementation is fairly straightforward. Would you be able to join us next week to start drafting it together?

In #193, a request was made to allow configuring Firecrown so that specific parameters would be entirely hidden from the sampler—meaning they would not appear as sampled parameters or in...

Closing for lack of feedback. If the issue can be described more clearly please open a new issue.

@tilmantroester You're right that conceptually, tomographic bins and redshift distributions exist independently of any particular statistic. However, in practice, once we move to modeling or prediction, we must connect those...

Hello @paulrogozenski , I think I know what's probably happening. When dealing with a window function Firecrown does not compute all C_ells necessary in the equation C^obs_ell = C_ells ....

> Two other suggestions for the examples: > > * Initialise the values in the cosmosis/cobaya/numcosmo centered around the ccl.CosmologyVanillaLCDM() cosmology > > * allow the user to specify outputs...

> @vitenti it would be amazing if we could provide a likelihood experiment (in .py for example) and then also be able to build the config files for numcosmo/cosmosis/cobaya... is...