Viktor

> Is this PR still relevant today? Yes but a bit later after IPsec CI improvement.

> let's add a matrix for the kind job and run with both `--test-concurrency=1` and `--test-concurrency=5`: https://github.com/cilium/cilium-cli/blob/main/.github/workflows/kind.yaml#L24 I've done some testing in CI and if `--test-concurrency=3` kind cluster needs 5...

> @viktor-kurchenko could you take a look at kind test failures? `from-cidr-host-netns/from-cidr-to-pod/host-netns-to-pod` seems to be failing consistently. Fixed!

> yeah any number greater than 1 is fine 🚀🙏 Done. Also, I've added [this ugly thing](https://github.com/cilium/cilium-cli/pull/2496/files#diff-e9c24daafcd1e27b49ed8503aee69248c36d7fc1a47ecbafffe36ba946c61f27R102-R103) due to the [annoying error](https://github.com/cilium/cilium-cli/actions/runs/8974239249/job/24648943491?pr=2496#step:11:78) Have you seen it before?

> no i haven't seen it before, we probably shouldn't do `|| true` to ignore the error. it might be better to increase the number of workers in a separate...

> you can keep this pr as is for now. just open a separate pr to increase the number of workers, and we can figure out what's going on there....

Hey @pchaigno, can I go ahead with the PR or we still need more time?

> Sorry, I didn't come back to this. Yep, I think we're good to go with IPsec changes now. Do we also want to document the new CLI command in...

> Proposal sounds good to me. As mentioned offline by Andre, it would be good to see a POC of how this would work. Namely, the aspect I have concerns...

> It would be useful to people like me that the document includes a list, at a high level, of the strategies that have already been explored and why they...